As can be seen clearly here. It was his Prototype notes that he wrote on the drawing when he drew it. There is nothing in the image that suggest he added the info later. Rather if that had been the case he would have written it with a computer and made it look mroe professional. This image was him just sharing the origanal note for the character.
Yeah but it isn't that ambiguous since at the bottom is his comment on the prototype which doesn't even mention how her personality changed. And her personality is pretty much the same as first described.
Regardless of whether it is referring exclusively to her prototype design or not, the original statement in the trivia section covered it fine since it referenced it being from the prototype page. I will revert the edits back to their original state.
EDIT: The page has already been reverted. Do not edit that section again.
How is it ambiguous? The bottom comment doesn't mention ANY changes. It doesn't say if she is still able to copy quirks or anything. All his bottom comment mentions is how her name changed and her appearance somewhat. Basically the notes are just notes for the proto-type. Nothing more and nothing less.
Again, notice how the bottom comment is made with computer writing. The computer writing is his comments about his old notes. The old notes are the ones that are written in pen. So when you reversed it again you did wrong.
Did you even read the changes I made? In my change it still mentions that there is info in the proto-type notes. The thing I changed was the false parts. The notes does not say anything about teh current Himiko, nor does it conclude that she is bisexual. It is a note Horikoshi made for himself where he basically jots down for future reference that Himiko MIGHT be interested in boty girl and boys. Or did you miss the part where it was a question?
Damage3245 wrote: > The notes does not say anything about teh current Himiko
The page currently doesn't say anything about the current Himiko either; only the prototype version which is why it is in trivia and not in another section. The page is fine as it is.
No it is not. Please compare my version with the one Halo wrote. His explicitly states that notes say that Himiko is bisexual. There is no mention of this only being for the prototype in his trivia version. Furthermore, the info does not even say that she is a bisexual, it is just a note for himself that it could be a future possibility. That is why it is a question mark. Your argument is silly though. The notes also show Himiko sporting other hairstyles and it mentions that she is able to copy quirks. Should the trivia now mention that she is able to copy quirks? Again, please read Halo's text again before you say something as silly as "it is fine". It is not fine, it has incorret information in it.
Regardless, it is actually on the prototype notes and just because it has a question mark doesn't make it untrue. Halo and I have discussed it and we agree that the page should remain as it is for now.
EDIT: My recommendation is that the topic be dropped.
Damage3245 wrote: Regardless, it is actually on the prototype notes and just because it has a question mark doesn't make it untrue. Halo and I have discussed it and we agree that the page should remain as it is for now.
You are still wrong. It does not say she was bisexual in the notes. It questions if this was the case. Horikoshi was basically saying that he was not sure if he wanted to make her bisexual or not. How can you state in the trivia that it says she is bisexual when it CLEARLY does not say that? I don't care if you have discussed it (with whom?), it is still false information. It is FAKE. How can you decide to keep fake information in the wiki?
At least write it like this:
"Horikoshi played with the idea of making her bisexual, but there was no information on what he decided to do in the end."
^This would be a true entry. What you have now in the trivia is wrong.