Talk: My Hero Academia: Vigilantes

Rules

Hello and welcome to My Hero Academia: Vigilantes's talk page! Whilst you are here, we would like you to take a quick look at some rules. Failure to follow these rules may result in a block. You have been warned.

This space is specifically for discussing changes to the article. For general discussion or questions regarding the subject, head to the Forum or create a Blog post.
Stay civil and always remember to sign your comments with ~~~~.
Put new text under old text and always start a new subject with a header. Click here to start a new topic.

6+alpha

there is also a plus alpha for 6. Idk how to create a page only edit one sorry.

Littlemetzler (talk) 17:11, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

Canonocity

Why is this classified as non-canon? Meshack (talk) 19:28, March 5, 2017 (UTC)

It's not written by the author. KingCannon (talk) 21:50, March 5, 2017 (UTC)

It is still canon to the canon story, so it still counts. Mr. Waddle Dee 16:57, November 7, 2017 (UTC)

Name

Are we gonna keep this page as is or change to Viz's title, "My Hero Academia: Vigilantes"? Meshack (talk) 04:26, August 12, 2017 (UTC)

Volume 1 character pages.

Here are the pages giving character info. It was photographed by a Japanese person. I haven't found a scan of the takoboun anywhere online, so if anyone could help provide better versions of these images, feel free to do so.

Seems I can figur eout how to make all three images to appear in a line. Well anyway, here are the images so you can see for yourself.--ExcelCore (talk) 19:59, August 30, 2017 (UTC)

Canon

I vote on treating this as canon Meshack (talk) 14:16, September 27, 2017 (UTC)

It uses and expands on elements of the main manga, so it's no different from most anime filler. Just because it elaborates more on the backstories of some characters from the main continuity doesn't make it canon either (anime filler does that as well).

This work is from a completely different author. If Horikoshi starts acknowledging elements of this work in his own, then yes. Otherwise no. Even Trigger is not fully acknowledged. There's a reason Horikoshi has not called the Quirk-enhancing drug by its proper name yet despite it being quite used recently in the manga. That way, he can leave it ambiguous, which would be unnecessary if it was canon.

It's usually simpler and more consistent to just consider the main work canon instead of just arbitrarily deciding what works are considered canon or not. KingCannon (talk) 16:03, September 27, 2017 (UTC)

There’s nothing against it being canon. That’s like saying Dragon Ball Super is not canon because it was not acknowledged in the Dragon Ball manga Meshack (talk) 16:15, September 27, 2017 (UTC)

A flawed example. Super is a sequel series, not a prequel, so how could it be acknowledged by the original? Plus Toriyama is reportedly writing for and overseeing Super. Has there been mention of Horikoshi doing the same for Vigilante? Dragonus Nesha (talk) 16:48, September 27, 2017 (UTC)